Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Santorum Mailbag

The email address posted on this blog (santorum@savagelove.net) has been defunct for an indeterminate amount of time, which some of you brought to my attention in the comments. Up and running as of yesterday afternoon, the email address has turned out an impressive wealth of awesomeness. So, with your blessing, I'd like to share some of the highlights with you. . . .
Dear Mr. Savage:

I used to enjoy reading your columns, though they could go a bit over the top.

Then you started this site.

It is not defamatory, as you say. It's just silly. I now consider you just a politician.


Best regards,

Vincent
Dear Vincent,

To my knowledge, Dan Savage doesn't actually check this email address. You see, he started this site, and has been known to post on it occasionally, but mostly it's just me (Jocelyn). I can safely say, however, that neither of us are politicians.

Warmest wishes,

Jocelyn


Reading your blog makes me feel better about the world..

So, thanks.
You're welcome!


Your definition of Santorum is sadly moronic. You evidently felt the need to select a hideous and repulsive description of something you are probably all too familiar with.
I would guess that you yourself are a proud homosexual and feel the need to degrade anyone who disagrees with your lifestyle. It probably also sooths [sic] and strokes your ego to learn that others have agreed with the depravity and like yourself choose to swim in cesspools of thought and word. It saddens me to see our culture being dragged through slime and volgarity [sic] by self proclaimed elitists. Your [sic] evidently moraless and I would guess part of the populace that intends to socialize and "change" the United States for her own good of course. "Change" isn't always good. Someday perhaps you will learn that sad lesson. Just as the ancient city Sodom was destroyed for it's deviancy, I believe the strange and uncivil behavior of individuals such as yourself will ultimately lead to society's demise. That is the legacy of the godless. That is the legacy of the progressive movement. Progressivly [sic] moving us to the legacy of Sodom. You don't even realize what you are doing. How sad for you. How sad for all.
I wish I was gay, because penises are funny-looking and the people attached to them are certifiably ridiculous (example: Rick Santorum). Alas, I am not.


Is America ready for a wiggy President? And what does it say about the character of somebody who is not prepared to be honest about their follicular deprivation. At least McCain and Bush snr went for the dodgy but defensible overcomb. What if Rick is on an aircraft carrier and the wind blows a gale? These questions need to be asked.

The hair patriot.
Um, thanks for sharing?


Please google santorum salad and post!
Okay:


Thanks for sharing!


I am probably about the 250,000th person to send you this, but I literally fell out of my chair laughing when I saw it, from, of all places, catholic.org:



Catholic.org: Likely the only news website not making Santorum jokes on purpose.



You must be a fucking Asshole leftist seeking freebies from everyone with money.

Go stuff the shit back up your ass.
Ew. No.


You guys will get a kick out of this:

Thanks for sharing!

9 comments:

  1. Stopping by to offer my contribution towards wicked satanic gay-lobby evilness. According to a some guy in some article I just read about this site. Please know that this shared definition of Santorum has made me happy for years. It's just one little thing that gives me the giggles and strikes me as perfect on a variety of levels. So thank you all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. HERE IS A SITE GIVING THE TRUE DEFINITION OF SANTORUM:

    http://santorum101.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/what-is-santorum/

    ReplyDelete
  3. DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CREATORS OF THE SANTORUM DEFINITION THING?

    IT SPEAKS ABOUT THE LAWSUIT HERE:

    http://santorum101.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/what-is-santorum/

    ReplyDelete
  4. PLEASE . . . DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CREATORS OF THE SANTORUM DEFINITION THING?

    IT SPEAKS ABOUT THE LAWSUIT HERE:

    http://santorum101.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/what-is-santorum/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Americans tend to ignore international comment and so Rupert Murdoch's backing of Santorum for Iowa is not to be ignored. Beware the media monolith.

    http://www.charlesfrith.com/2011/12/rupert-murdoch-primary.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rick Santorum > Obama. That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  7. They criticize this website for holding someone accountable for their freedom of speech (freedom of speech doesn't mean you are free from criticism), however they are threatening to file a lawsuit against this websites right to freedom of speech?

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  8. Santorum Salad appears to be mixed with a frothy dressing. Ew.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As long as you're adding [sic]s to the email from the person who is so sad for us all, you can also add one after "moraless" and one after "it's" before deviancy.

    ReplyDelete